Joint Breakfast debate: Common views on the Energy Efficiency potential in building and transport sectors

Enel and EU-ASE welcome the revision of the Directives on Energy Efficiency and Energy Performance of Buildings proposed within the Clean Energy for All Europeans package in view of setting an EU long-term framework for improving energy efficiency investments: key drivers of the low carbon economy transition. Buildings and transports offer a huge potential for efficiency gains: in-depth evaluation1 of the aggregated savings potentials in different sectors found that buildings and transport have the highest share for cost-effective energy savings, respectively 61% and 41%, followed by the tertiary sector (38%) and industry (26%).

In addition, in 2015 the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimated that, in Europe, approximately 70% of emissions cuts to stay below 2°C will need to come from energy efficiency which was described by the IEA itself as an energy source in its own right.

There is no technology gap and energy efficiency is a business opportunity not only for solution providers. Also the power sector, which has already come a long way in its transformation towards decarbonization, can be the key driver for further driving energy savings in these end-use sectors.

Enel and EU-ASE believe that an effective EU policy framework on energy efficiency should ensure predictability and security for investments, consistency, flexibility and market-driven cost-effectiveness, with a specific focus on the urban context where the majority of the population lives and significant co-benefits arise as improvement of air quality and minimization of related health risks.

Exploiting the synergies between the building and transport sectors and the electricity system means integrating efficient technologies and services through the smart grids, towards the development of smart cities.

BUILDINGS 

Citizens spend 90% of their lives inside buildings which currently account for 40% of EU primary energy demand and represent 36% of CO2 emissions. 9 out of every 10 of the existing buildings in the EU will still be standing and occupied by 2050 and 75% of them were constructed with low (or no) energy efficiency requirements. This is why existing buildings should be put at the center of the EU’s energy efficiency strategy by setting a reliable and coherent EU framework for the definition of national long-term renovation strategies for the entire building stock.

A reduction of energy consumption through energy efficiency measures must be prioritized to firmly apply the “Efficiency First” principle in building renovation, while boosting their integration as active players in the modern energy system.

Renovation strategies should be developed within each specific national energy transition context by planning in terms of districts and entire energy systems, rather than focusing only on individual buildings to reap the full potential of high-efficiency energy supply solutions and maximize the energy saving potential of the entire energy chain.

Digitalization will play a key role in managing and integrating renewable and distributed generation, while reducing energy consumption and empowering end-users towards energy efficient behaviours. Such market changes will be accelerated by the increasing ‘smart readiness’ of buildings able to respond to market signals through demand response. As a result, the role and value of transmission and distribution networks and infrastructure will surge. The change is not only technological but also cultural: operators, but also regulators will need to quickly evolve to meet the new challenges.

TRANSPORT 

Urban mobility accounts for 40% of all CO2 emissions of road transport. Electric vehicles (EV) are the solution to decarbonize transport, improve air quality and enhance energy efficiency as the efficiency of electric motors (80-90%) is much higher than the one of combustion engines (20-30%).

However, it is essential to stimulate their EU market penetration by removing the economic and non-economic barriers currently hindering a quicker uptake.

Smart grids play a crucial role within the EU’s decarbonisation process by supporting the development of e-mobility as well as a structural role in smart cities offering part of the infrastructure needed for the activation of new approaches of thinking and acting within urban ecosystem. On the demand side, smart grids and smart meters enable consumers to actively manage their own energy demand and put in place energy efficient behaviors. Demand side services provided by EV batteries and smart charging solutions can be a key catalyst for consumer’s empowerment, so important to drive energy savings.

Follow us


Privacy Policy

© All right reserved

The vote you’ve never heard of – and why it can change Europe’s investment climate

A revision of the EU accounting rules on the treatment of public-private energy performance contracts would allow massive injections of investment into the EU economy. Yet, there is opposition from some national statistical offices — especially Germany –which have to take a position next week, writes Monica Frassoni.

Monica Frassoni is a former MEP and current President of the European Alliance to Save Energy.

Next week member states will make up their minds on whether or not EU accounting rules on the treatment of public-private energy performance contracts (EPCs) should be changed.

It is a high-stakes decision. A revision would allow massive injections of private sector investment into the EU economy. Yet, there is opposition from some national statistical offices, who have to take a position by 25 July.

 

At the moment there is an inconsistency in how rules are applied to public/private energy efficiency investments, which are considered ‘on balance sheet’, compared to public /private investment in highways and roads, which are ‘off balance sheet’.

Public sector bodies – cities, local authorities and mayors – currently have to class third party financing for energy efficiency improvements as public debt. This means they often have to turn down good projects or ‘bankrupt’ their books. The reform would unlock the doors on large amounts of private investment – for example, from banks or pension funds investing via energy service companies – with the investment repaid from the savings on energy bills.

This means they often have to turn down good projects or ‘bankrupt’ their books. The reform would unlock the doors on large amounts of private investment – for example, from banks or pension funds investing via energy service companies – with the investment repaid from the savings on energy bills.

This private money would flow into the EU economy, where it is vitally needed to fund warmer buildings, cheaper lighting, cleaner air and increased energy security for EU citizens – all at no risk to the public authorities. At the same time, it would be helping member states implement the Paris Agreement and meet the 2030 climate and energy goals at least cost.

Many EU member states are still experiencing low-growth, low-investment environments. The mantra everywhere is that attracting private sector investment into infrastructure and EU businesses will be key to driving a sustained economic recovery in Europe.

A very wide range of stakeholders, including EU Commissioners, municipalities, businesses, investors and civil society representatives agree that the reform of the accounting treatment of EPCs is one of the key barriers to close this investment gap.

Numerous examples of aborted energy efficiency investment in public buildings from Spain to Slovakia have been brought forward as evidence that a change is both proportionate and justified.

The arguments and evidence have been extensively considered and consulted upon within the statistical community. Eurostat has moved forward to suggest progressive solutions based around recognising energy services provided via EPCs as just that – energy services, with finance solutions and operational risk provided by private sector providers.

A group of progressive countries including France, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland recognise the strategic importance of resolving the issue and are committed to moving forward from proposal to reality.

Yet not everybody seems to share the same positive idea. We hear European utilities – whose business models will be forced to a major change to accommodate the rise of a new services-based energy industry if the revision goes through – are actively lobbying against the change. The German statistical office seems to be listening to them. Others, like Sweden or Finland, seem also to be doubtful.

This is not some abstract academic issue. The USA already has an accounting system similar to the one proposed by Eurostat. The US energy services market is worth around $4-6 billion per year, compared to just €150m in the EU at the moment.

The recently published High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance Interim Report singled out the EPC accounting rule issue out as an early priority to resolve, recognising it as a key ‘lever’ the EU can pull to quickly and effectively channel private sector finance to a simply vast investment opportunity that will create new employment opportunities for EU citizens working for EU firms delivering EU infrastructure.

In the aftermath of the financial and sovereign debt crises, and in the face of the very grave threat climate changes pose to our European way of life, all parts of the financial system need to change to deliver the sustainable economy we need. This includes the institutions that govern it.

National statistical offices must play an active role in helping create the new ‘rules of the game’ needed to underpin the EU’s transformation to a sustainable economy. We hope that in the days ahead they will vote for change.

 

Source: euractiv.com

Follow us


Privacy Policy

© All right reserved

EU under fire over ‘weak outcome’ of new energy directives

The European Union has come under fire over what has been labelled a “weak outcome” after energy ministers rubber stamped new EU energy efficiency directives.

Earlier this week European Union ministers reached an agreement on new targets to be established within both the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the Energy Efficiency Directive.

Having initially set out to establish a binding 30% energy efficiency target, the EU eventually agreed to set the desired efficiency rate at 30% but make it non-binding. A number of member states argued the target should be lowered to 27%, however these calls were resisted.

Read the full article here: https://www.cleanenergynews.co.uk/news/efficiency/eu-under-fire-over-weak-outcome-of-new-energy-directives

Follow us


Privacy Policy

© All right reserved

European Alliance to Save Energy views on the draft ITRE Report on the Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) the European Alliance to Save Energy (EU-ASE) welcomes Mr Bendtsen MEP’s draft report on the EPBD revision

Dear Members,

Re: European Alliance to Save Energy views on the draft ITRE Report on the Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) the European Alliance to Save Energy (EU-ASE) welcomes Mr Bendtsen MEP’s draft report on the EPBD revision which sets a very good basis for the EPBD to support the reduction of energy consumption of the existing building stock, in line with the Efficiency First principle. We fully endorse the rapporteur’s view that “an ambitious and future-proof Directive for the Energy Performance of Buildings is (…) needed to secure a highly energy efficient and decarbonised European building stock.”

EU-ASE regrets that yesterday the Energy Council has reached a General Approach on a very weak EPBD text which waters down the Commission’s proposal. The General Approach has weakened many provisions which do not set a clear and coherent EU 2050 pathway towards a highly efficient and decarbonized building stock and do not ensure any meaningful improvement on technical building systems.

In this perspective, EU-ASE is ready to offer support to all ITRE Committee Members to further improve and strengthen some articles to get an ambitious revision of the EPBD and make it a true success for citizens, businesses and investors.

EU-ASE has identified 3 main areas where the draft report should be enhanced:

• The EPBD must be aligned and coherent with a cost-effective EU energy efficiency target: the EPBD should head towards achieving an overall binding 40% energy efficiency target. This level of ambition, already supported by the European Parliament, is pivotal for the EU to deliver on the Paris Agreement and ensure the expected savings alongside health, energy security and jobs benefits. This ambition is based on in-depth evaluation of the aggregated savings potentials in key sectors, notably buildings and transport, and is entirely feasible under current market conditions with existing technologies.

• Further strengthening of ambitious national long-term renovation strategies: we welcome the rapporteur’s approach to link and clarify the contribution of these strategies to the achievement of the EU 2030 target for energy efficiency. In this sense, EU-ASE fully endorses the requirement to Member States to shape comprehensive and ambitious building renovation strategies, and to make clear their contribution to the achievement of the EED target.

We encourage ITRE members to support and consolidate these strategies:

– The objective should now be on reinforcing the national renovation strategies with a focus on worst performing buildings, the addition of trigger points, a new milestone set at 2040 and the clarification that the 2050 final goal is to ensure a highly energy efficient and decarbonised building stock (in line with the correct implementation of the Efficiency First principle).

– Member States should be encouraged to plan their renovation strategies in terms of district and entire energy systems to reap the full potential of high-efficiency energy demand and supply solutions and achieve energy efficiency gains throughout the entire energy chain. By doing so, renovation strategies will also achieve synergies in terms of possible use of waste heat, and integrations of various parts of energy systems (heat, electricity, buildings and transport) adding to potential energy gains.

– Further strengthening is necessary to ensure that the long-term renovation strategies lead to concrete actions. The national strategies must have a differentiated approach and targets for buildings categories to consider cost-competitiveness and streamline the mobilization of financing. They should also make room for energy performance services and contracts that can contribute towards significant energy savings with little to no capex in short periods of time.

– Building Renovation Passports should be fostered as tools to accelerate and support ambitious, coordinated step-by-step building renovation.

• Optimising Technical Building Systems: the report is missing meaningful improvements for provisions related to technical building systems, that would fully embrace the cost-effective potential for energy management at building level through building automation, control, monitoring, management systems and built-in lighting. Notably, strengthened articles 8.5, 8.6, Article 14 and Article 15 are critical to ensure appropriate adjustment and control of technical building systems. In order to accelerate renovation and enable buildings’ connectivity to the energy system, key functionalities shall be prescribed in non-residential buildings over 250 MWh/a and in residential buildings with central technical building system of over 100kw power. Additionally, appropriate control functionalities in individual rooms are needed in particular in those residential buildings.

Further details on our positions concerning both the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) and the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) are included in the Position Papers enclosed to this letter.

Follow us


Privacy Policy

© All right reserved